WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.408 --> 00:00:05.450
You're listening to Strictly Business
Podcast with Lindsay Williams.

2
00:00:05.451 --> 00:00:11.771
Welcome, and today we are in conversation
with Gail Daniel, Portfolio Manager for

3
00:00:11.771 --> 00:00:13.771
the 91 Managed Fund.

4
00:00:13.771 --> 00:00:16.573
What a time to be a Portfolio Manager,
Gail, but we'll get to the contemporary

5
00:00:16.573 --> 00:00:18.573
matters in a moment.

6
00:00:18.573 --> 00:00:20.573
Let's look back a little bit, though.

7
00:00:20.573 --> 00:00:24.475
The Managed Fund had a fairly difficult Q2
and Q3 of 2024, but a strong recovery,

8
00:00:24.555 --> 00:00:26.156
thank goodness, since then.

9
00:00:26.216 --> 00:00:27.176
What were the reasons for...

10
00:00:27.456 --> 00:00:32.658
The underperformance, first of all, get
that out of the way, and now the recent

11
00:00:32.658 --> 00:00:34.658
outperformance.

12
00:00:34.658 --> 00:00:35.980
Good morning, Lindsay, and thank you for
the call.

13
00:00:36.160 --> 00:00:37.941
The fund underperformed in Q2 and Q3,

14
00:00:38.461 --> 00:00:44.624
basically on the back of what is looking
more and more like a fairy tale of the

15
00:00:44.624 --> 00:00:44.925
GNU.

16
00:00:45.584 --> 00:00:52.027
So the local market anticipated a big
rebound in GDP growth, a big rebound in

17
00:00:52.027 --> 00:00:52.147
earnings,

18
00:00:52.147 --> 00:00:53.368
took the shares up ahead of it.

19
00:00:53.408 --> 00:01:00.213
but particularly the small and mid-cap
shares, which is quite hard for a large

20
00:01:00.213 --> 00:01:02.213
fund to buy, and where the market,

21
00:01:02.213 --> 00:01:07.418
you know, kind of has a fixation to the
extent they create other indices like the

22
00:01:07.418 --> 00:01:09.418
SWICs, you know, anything but the large
cap shares.

23
00:01:09.418 --> 00:01:11.418
And then that faded.

24
00:01:11.418 --> 00:01:15.343
Despite GDP growth came in, I think it was
0.6 or 0.7 last year, sub 1%,

25
00:01:15.463 --> 00:01:18.626
basically half of what the market was
looking for at its height.

26
00:01:19.206 --> 00:01:25.774
And the earnings revisions didn't come
through, to spot In some cases,

27
00:01:25.774 --> 00:01:27.774
particularly in the consumer sector, where
we were very underweight,

28
00:01:27.774 --> 00:01:32.579
enormous tailwinds in terms of the
two-part no-load shedding, interest rate

29
00:01:32.579 --> 00:01:34.579
cuts,

30
00:01:34.579 --> 00:01:39.344
low inflation, yet, you know, still with
GDP per capita not growing in South

31
00:01:39.344 --> 00:01:41.344
Africa, the consumer has struggled.

32
00:01:41.344 --> 00:01:46.389
And as the growth fantasy kind of unwound,
so the shares gave back a lot of that

33
00:01:46.389 --> 00:01:46.549
growth,

34
00:01:47.269 --> 00:01:51.292
we started doing a bit better, And then we
benefited from...

35
00:01:52.449 --> 00:01:59.333
the initial Trump rally and we benefited
from the resurgence in Europe in Q1

36
00:01:59.873 --> 00:02:06.397
on the offshore side and of course the
RAND has been a bit weaker since almost

37
00:02:06.397 --> 00:02:06.477
touching

38
00:02:06.477 --> 00:02:09.679
17 I think in October we're

39
00:02:09.680 --> 00:02:16.604
now sitting at about mid-19s and that
helps the fund as the fund has more

40
00:02:16.604 --> 00:02:18.604
offshore and peers.

41
00:02:18.604 --> 00:02:20.604
Now, the phrase U.S.

42
00:02:20.604 --> 00:02:22.169
exceptionalism, Gail, has sort of crept
into our vocabulary, hasn't it?

43
00:02:22.650 --> 00:02:24.370
And yeah, it was an exceptional country.

44
00:02:24.670 --> 00:02:29.531
It still is or still has the potential to
be exceptional, just not quite as

45
00:02:29.531 --> 00:02:31.531
exceptional as it was a while ago.

46
00:02:31.531 --> 00:02:32.552
Is it over or is this just a pause, do you
think?

47
00:02:33.232 --> 00:02:35.153
Well, I think for now it's a pause.

48
00:02:35.633 --> 00:02:41.154
And if we look at what was exceptional
about the U.S., and it is exceptional in

49
00:02:41.154 --> 00:02:43.154
quite a few ways, you know,

50
00:02:43.154 --> 00:02:46.336
it has incredibly deep financial markets,
it's an incredible internal market, it's

51
00:02:46.336 --> 00:02:48.336
very gifted.

52
00:02:48.336 --> 00:02:49.402
naturally with resources and geography.

53
00:02:50.943 --> 00:02:55.145
But they also had a Fed that was
exceptional, very quick to cut.

54
00:02:56.186 --> 00:03:02.130
Cut when unemployment was 4% and in Q3
when growth was still very strong.

55
00:03:02.750 --> 00:03:09.635
And a Fed, a treasury, which was prepared
to have a deficit running close to 7%

56
00:03:10.356 --> 00:03:11.837
on 4% unemployment.

57
00:03:12.657 --> 00:03:14.859
So that generated this exceptional growth.

58
00:03:14.979 --> 00:03:16.740
And now in a move which actually...

59
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:21.442
is also reasonably exceptional, is that
you have a political system,

60
00:03:21.902 --> 00:03:24.283
which is an election cycle of four years,

61
00:03:24.764 --> 00:03:29.346
attempting to pull back the deficit and
being prepared to risk growth.

62
00:03:29.566 --> 00:03:31.907
Now, you know, it's very tricky.

63
00:03:31.987 --> 00:03:33.127
It's walking a tightrope.

64
00:03:33.128 --> 00:03:35.008
It remains to be seen what happens there.

65
00:03:35.869 --> 00:03:39.490
So I can definitely oppose there in terms
of US exceptionalism.

66
00:03:40.150 --> 00:03:43.372
But then if we extend the question, where
else is exceptional?

67
00:03:44.544 --> 00:03:46.225
And I don't think China is exceptional.

68
00:03:46.365 --> 00:03:50.166
It's taking more and more debt to generate
less and less growth.

69
00:03:51.107 --> 00:03:57.630
But the area that has been rudely awakened
by Trump is definitely Europe.

70
00:03:58.090 --> 00:04:02.892
And I think you're going to see
exceptional fiscal stimulus finally coming

71
00:04:02.892 --> 00:04:02.911
out,

72
00:04:03.052 --> 00:04:09.615
because Europe has to now put down its own
defense after having for 80 years or so

73
00:04:09.615 --> 00:04:11.615
had the

74
00:04:11.615 --> 00:04:13.615
luxury of the U.S.

75
00:04:13.615 --> 00:04:15.615
paying for their defense so they could
roll out.

76
00:04:15.615 --> 00:04:17.615
their lovely social system.

77
00:04:17.615 --> 00:04:21.322
And I think we will see exceptional fiscal
stimulus in certain areas in Europe.

78
00:04:21.502 --> 00:04:27.646
So the funds had more Europe than it used
to, and we kind of just picked it up from

79
00:04:27.646 --> 00:04:29.646
the bottom up,

80
00:04:29.646 --> 00:04:31.249
cheaper shares, good earnings growth.

81
00:04:31.250 --> 00:04:36.913
Yes, living in Europe as I am, it really
does seem that the Trump factor, the

82
00:04:36.913 --> 00:04:38.913
recent Trump factor,

83
00:04:38.913 --> 00:04:40.913
has galvanised Europe.

84
00:04:40.913 --> 00:04:42.913
We'll see if it plays out anyway.

85
00:04:42.913 --> 00:04:44.913
Now, what about South Africa?

86
00:04:44.913 --> 00:04:46.913
You have been unattended.

87
00:04:46.913 --> 00:04:48.913
apologetically negative on the outlook for
South Africa for some time.

88
00:04:48.913 --> 00:04:49.733
You remain underweight SA equities and
bonds relative to your peers,

89
00:04:50.053 --> 00:04:56.481
but recent developments around the budget
and GNU, they've probably sort of embedded

90
00:04:56.481 --> 00:04:58.481
that feeling that you have.

91
00:04:58.481 --> 00:05:00.481
Well.

92
00:05:00.481 --> 00:05:03.362
I think it's probably more apt to call it
a GNDU, a government of this unison.

93
00:05:04.162 --> 00:05:09.606
And it really does appear that the ANCDA
relationship is broken.

94
00:05:10.807 --> 00:05:17.772
And, you know, maybe the GNU continues,
the ANC as we speak is trying to

95
00:05:17.772 --> 00:05:19.772
negotiate, it looks like a different one.

96
00:05:19.772 --> 00:05:26.078
But if you look at substance over form, I
mean, what has the GNU generated?

97
00:05:26.626 --> 00:05:29.208
Has it generated faster economic growth?

98
00:05:29.669 --> 00:05:30.870
No, not yet.

99
00:05:31.270 --> 00:05:33.232
Has it generated increased investment?

100
00:05:33.312 --> 00:05:39.036
It was supposed to come, but with what's
going on with the budget, it's looking

101
00:05:39.036 --> 00:05:41.036
increasingly unlikely.

102
00:05:41.036 --> 00:05:42.960
So I think we, you know, we're not even
through on the budget.

103
00:05:43.020 --> 00:05:44.741
There's another vote that needs to come.

104
00:05:45.262 --> 00:05:51.026
All this is resulting in forecasts for GDP
growth and earnings on local shares being

105
00:05:51.026 --> 00:05:51.106
cut.

106
00:05:51.807 --> 00:05:55.170
And GDP growth, which analysts were
forecasting excess.

107
00:05:55.330 --> 00:05:58.212
2% for 2025 at the start of the year.

108
00:05:59.413 --> 00:06:04.757
You know, we were already at forecasts
coming in 1.2, 1.4%,

109
00:06:04.758 --> 00:06:07.559
and you can easily make the case for
sub-1%.

110
00:06:08.439 --> 00:06:15.204
I think it's directly impacting on
confidence and this hope and this dream

111
00:06:15.204 --> 00:06:17.204
that everyone had that the

112
00:06:17.204 --> 00:06:20.648
DA and the ANC were so different and they
could get together, and because they were

113
00:06:20.648 --> 00:06:22.648
different, it would work,

114
00:06:22.648 --> 00:06:23.590
has kind of been shown up just.

115
00:06:23.690 --> 00:06:25.451
to be completely unrealistic.

116
00:06:26.092 --> 00:06:30.194
So I think it's going to be very difficult
for us here.

117
00:06:30.555 --> 00:06:37.479
You know, this is before you bring in the
rapidly changing world of geopolitics, but

118
00:06:37.479 --> 00:06:39.479
very difficult for us to get growth
surprises.

119
00:06:39.479 --> 00:06:42.303
To the upside, currency's been weakening
and we're vulnerable there.

120
00:06:43.103 --> 00:06:49.207
So I just, those earnings forecasts didn't
come through last year and they're not

121
00:06:49.207 --> 00:06:51.207
coming through now.

122
00:06:51.207 --> 00:06:53.110
And I'm afraid I cannot get excited.

123
00:06:53.738 --> 00:06:55.720
about the South African economy.

124
00:06:55.721 --> 00:07:01.365
Yeah, a lot of people would say, well,
you're being unpatriotic, but of course

125
00:07:01.365 --> 00:07:03.365
that's absolute nonsense.

126
00:07:03.365 --> 00:07:05.365
You're being realistic.

127
00:07:05.365 --> 00:07:08.671
Right, I'm compelled to talk about current
market movements, and I must say that

128
00:07:08.671 --> 00:07:10.671
since we started this podcast,

129
00:07:10.671 --> 00:07:14.276
market movements may have changed because
Trump has said something or someone else

130
00:07:14.276 --> 00:07:16.276
has said something.

131
00:07:16.276 --> 00:07:18.600
But have you changed your asset allocation
given the recent turmoil?

132
00:07:18.640 --> 00:07:20.802
Well, I was...

133
00:07:21.242 --> 00:07:27.805
reasonably heavy in equities towards the
end of the first quarter, but I did take

134
00:07:27.805 --> 00:07:27.885
it down,

135
00:07:27.885 --> 00:07:30.666
fortunately, ahead of the tariffs.

136
00:07:31.286 --> 00:07:33.887
As you say, the situation is incredibly
fluid.

137
00:07:33.987 --> 00:07:36.008
It's bouncing around all over the place.

138
00:07:36.729 --> 00:07:42.891
And at the moment, I was sitting where I
would consider neutral equities,

139
00:07:42.951 --> 00:07:47.873
neutral risk assets, but more offshore
than onshore, obviously.

140
00:07:48.433 --> 00:07:51.175
I'm going to keep the on show I mean, the
offshore,

141
00:07:51.635 --> 00:07:55.817
as long as I can in terms of the mandate
and the regulations,

142
00:07:56.357 --> 00:08:00.959
I don't see any reason for the RAND to be
strong in this environment.

143
00:08:01.499 --> 00:08:05.601
And I think the environment is going to
remain very difficult and very choppy.

144
00:08:06.581 --> 00:08:08.782
And countries are going to have to pick.

145
00:08:09.182 --> 00:08:10.223
Are you with the U.S.

146
00:08:10.383 --> 00:08:11.823
or are you not with the U.S.?

147
00:08:12.083 --> 00:08:18.426
And I think in terms of geographical asset
allocation, the countries and the

148
00:08:18.426 --> 00:08:20.426
companies that...

149
00:08:20.426 --> 00:08:22.426
Pick the U.S.

150
00:08:22.426 --> 00:08:24.426
We'll do better simply because the U.S.

151
00:08:24.426 --> 00:08:25.767
is the biggest buyer, and that is a market
you're going to need to sell it to.

152
00:08:26.147 --> 00:08:28.609
Obviously, such times present
opportunities.

153
00:08:28.669 --> 00:08:30.110
Everyone's saying, oh, woe is me.

154
00:08:30.190 --> 00:08:30.890
Look at the market.

155
00:08:30.910 --> 00:08:32.331
It's down 7%, down 6%.

156
00:08:33.452 --> 00:08:38.896
Then it's up 8% or, in the best-ex case in
the recent bounce back, up 13% in one day,

157
00:08:38.956 --> 00:08:40.677
one of the biggest moves in history.

158
00:08:41.157 --> 00:08:46.260
But in adversity comes asset allocation
opportunity, Gail.

159
00:08:46.261 --> 00:08:47.061
Are you seeing that?

160
00:08:47.581 --> 00:08:48.482
Yes, a bit.

161
00:08:48.702 --> 00:08:54.026
Yes, and it's one of the strengths of the
fund because the offshore is big in the

162
00:08:54.026 --> 00:08:54.226
managed

163
00:08:54.226 --> 00:08:58.109
land and you can move that around very,
very quickly.

164
00:09:00.110 --> 00:09:00.810
And I do.

165
00:09:01.431 --> 00:09:06.474
So, for instance, last night when the
Trump tariffs were announced, I've been

166
00:09:06.474 --> 00:09:08.474
underweight NASDAQ.

167
00:09:08.474 --> 00:09:10.474
I bought in.

168
00:09:10.474 --> 00:09:12.474
It was up seven when I bought in.

169
00:09:12.474 --> 00:09:14.474
Didn't feel too good.

170
00:09:14.474 --> 00:09:16.474
Felt a bit better when it closed up 12.

171
00:09:16.474 --> 00:09:18.474
But, you know, you have to.

172
00:09:18.474 --> 00:09:20.474
It is a very fluid situation.

173
00:09:20.474 --> 00:09:24.150
The market was oversold in due advance,
but I don't think we're going from here

174
00:09:24.150 --> 00:09:26.150
back into a long-term bull market.

175
00:09:26.150 --> 00:09:28.150
I think it will be more difficult.

176
00:09:28.150 --> 00:09:32.556
If you look at the course as a whole, you
have gone overweight European and UK

177
00:09:32.556 --> 00:09:34.556
equities and underweight US equities.

178
00:09:34.556 --> 00:09:35.258
So there was a balancing act going on
there.

179
00:09:35.278 --> 00:09:37.560
What drove the change in geographical
allocation?

180
00:09:37.780 --> 00:09:43.624
You have sort of answered that in previous
answers, but just reiterate, geographical

181
00:09:43.624 --> 00:09:45.624
allocation, why?

182
00:09:45.624 --> 00:09:47.624
Oh.

183
00:09:47.624 --> 00:09:51.275
I mean, the one thing about the UK is when
you go there and you speak to four people

184
00:09:51.275 --> 00:09:53.275
in the lift,

185
00:09:53.275 --> 00:09:58.168
you're semi-suicidal by the time you get
out the lift because they really are

186
00:09:58.168 --> 00:10:00.168
pessimistic

187
00:10:00.168 --> 00:10:02.168
about the outlook there.

188
00:10:02.168 --> 00:10:05.794
And the outlook for growth is somewhat
muted, but they do have some very good

189
00:10:05.794 --> 00:10:07.794
businesses.

190
00:10:07.794 --> 00:10:09.757
For instance, Next, the clothing company,

191
00:10:09.837 --> 00:10:16.361
which was trading at a discount to our
clothing shares in South Africa at the

192
00:10:16.361 --> 00:10:18.361
time with better growth.

193
00:10:18.361 --> 00:10:21.705
They've got some banks there which trade
cheaper than our banks with better growth.

194
00:10:21.925 --> 00:10:28.349
So it was completely a bottom-up decision
that that market has reasonable growth.

195
00:10:29.190 --> 00:10:30.491
at an attractive price.

196
00:10:31.272 --> 00:10:37.976
And the same kind of story drove one into
some of the European banks because where

197
00:10:37.976 --> 00:10:39.976
our banks who

198
00:10:39.976 --> 00:10:44.841
don't actually cover their cost of
capital, such as APSA, trade on 0.9 times

199
00:10:44.841 --> 00:10:46.841
book,

200
00:10:46.841 --> 00:10:50.425
in Europe, if a company's ROE is below its
cost of capital, it trades on 0.4 book.

201
00:10:51.686 --> 00:10:56.329
So our market is not as cheap as people
like to think it is.

202
00:10:56.389 --> 00:11:02.550
and a lot of people People in South Africa
just look at the market of what is the PE

203
00:11:02.550 --> 00:11:04.550
relative to historic PE,

204
00:11:04.550 --> 00:11:06.733
and they don't really look at it compared
to the global ratings.

205
00:11:06.833 --> 00:11:10.155
So that's one of the things I found
attractive in Europe.

206
00:11:10.355 --> 00:11:11.896
And then Rheinmetall, which

207
00:11:13.658 --> 00:11:17.881
I have taken a few profits on because I
think it was like 120% here today.

208
00:11:18.541 --> 00:11:25.386
But we actually got into that last year,
September, October, because before Trump

209
00:11:25.386 --> 00:11:27.386
went in,

210
00:11:27.386 --> 00:11:32.299
denatored Europe, it had good growth at a
very reasonable PE.

211
00:11:33.199 --> 00:11:37.922
So, and particularly relative to the US
because the US was getting more expensive.

212
00:11:38.583 --> 00:11:45.067
Now, the interesting thing with the US
shares is that some of them, like booking

213
00:11:45.067 --> 00:11:47.067
and Netflix, you know,

214
00:11:47.067 --> 00:11:47.109
trade at cheaper multiples and clicks.

215
00:11:48.229 --> 00:11:51.071
Now, I don't think those businesses are
comparable.

216
00:11:51.211 --> 00:11:54.734
So, when I get the opportunity to buy
there again, I certainly will.

217
00:11:55.414 --> 00:11:57.355
Okay, final question, which sort of wraps
things up.

218
00:11:57.395 --> 00:11:59.735
I hope it will anyway to our satisfaction.

219
00:12:00.795 --> 00:12:07.137
Managed strategy continues to be a
differentiated offering relative to the

220
00:12:07.137 --> 00:12:09.137
peers in the sector.

221
00:12:09.137 --> 00:12:09.278
That's one of the great things about your
fund.

222
00:12:09.938 --> 00:12:13.019
What do you think will be your next move
in asset allocation?

223
00:12:13.059 --> 00:12:15.019
Again, you've answered it to a certain
extent.

224
00:12:15.239 --> 00:12:16.640
Are you sometimes tempted, Gail,

225
00:12:17.340 --> 00:12:23.442
to get back from work and sit down and
watch a bit of business television and

226
00:12:23.442 --> 00:12:25.442
say, you know what,

227
00:12:25.442 --> 00:12:27.442
I'd rather just sit on the fence?

228
00:12:27.442 --> 00:12:31.090
I want to reallocate here and there and
everywhere, but it might be wrong in 48

229
00:12:31.090 --> 00:12:33.090
hours.

230
00:12:33.090 --> 00:12:35.090
Do you ever get tempted to do that?

231
00:12:35.090 --> 00:12:35.353
Or are you planning your next move?

232
00:12:38.795 --> 00:12:43.558
I'm not tempted to sit on the fence.

233
00:12:43.559 --> 00:12:47.161
I will buy South Africa when the growth
rate,

234
00:12:47.341 --> 00:12:52.825
if the growth rate picks up properly and
the share values are attractive at the

235
00:12:52.825 --> 00:12:52.905
time.

236
00:12:53.465 --> 00:12:54.806
And I look forward to doing it.

237
00:12:55.146 --> 00:12:55.846
that.

238
00:12:55.867 --> 00:13:01.331
I just cannot see the current political
environment being conducive to that.

239
00:13:02.592 --> 00:13:07.055
And I'm not a natural fence sitter.

240
00:13:07.455 --> 00:13:13.799
And I think some of the things that go on
in the industry are absolute career

241
00:13:13.799 --> 00:13:15.799
protection over

242
00:13:15.799 --> 00:13:17.799
investment returns.

243
00:13:17.799 --> 00:13:22.606
And at certain things, for instance,
certain indices and the creation of them

244
00:13:22.606 --> 00:13:24.606
are just completely self-serving.

245
00:13:24.606 --> 00:13:26.368
not actually economically sound.

246
00:13:27.149 --> 00:13:32.432
So no, when I'm watching TV or the
business news,

247
00:13:32.672 --> 00:13:37.676
looking through the business channels, I
don't get tempted to do that.

248
00:13:38.196 --> 00:13:45.081
Okay, and for now, the week around went to
all-time record lows, or very close to it,

249
00:13:45.081 --> 00:13:47.081
in the last week or so before this
podcast.

250
00:13:47.081 --> 00:13:50.244
And the SA sell-off now definitely helping
you, isn't it?

251
00:13:50.725 --> 00:13:51.846
Yes.

252
00:13:54.154 --> 00:13:55.975
It does help me when the rand is weaker.

253
00:13:56.095 --> 00:13:59.877
And you know what people forget is that
the rand has been very weak against the

254
00:13:59.877 --> 00:14:00.158
euro.

255
00:14:00.937 --> 00:14:05.719
Because the rand is sold off against the
dollar, it's sold off a lot more against

256
00:14:05.719 --> 00:14:07.719
the euro in part.

257
00:14:07.719 --> 00:14:07.800
I've been underweighted.

258
00:14:07.801 --> 00:14:09.521
I said bonds, they've done badly.

259
00:14:10.641 --> 00:14:14.323
I think we're at risk from sanctions from
the US.

260
00:14:15.363 --> 00:14:21.466
We're at risk that the numbers that the
Treasury have put into the budget are just

261
00:14:21.466 --> 00:14:23.466
plain wrong.

262
00:14:23.466 --> 00:14:25.592
They're looking for 1%, 1.8% growth this
year.

263
00:14:25.872 --> 00:14:27.032
They're fighting about that.

264
00:14:27.052 --> 00:14:30.934
Every day they fight about that, that
growth rate's going down and the hole is

265
00:14:30.934 --> 00:14:30.934
getting bigger.

266
00:14:32.135 --> 00:14:35.036
So, you know, I'm not tempted there.

267
00:14:35.376 --> 00:14:38.238
Gail, thank you very much for your great
analysis, as always.

268
00:14:38.278 --> 00:14:43.140
Gail Daniel is a portfolio manager
responsible for the 91 Managed Fund.

269
00:14:44.184 --> 00:14:51.130
The views and opinions expressed in these
podcasts are those of Lindsay Williams and

270
00:14:51.130 --> 00:14:53.130
various contributors and do not reflect
the policy,

271
00:14:53.130 --> 00:14:54.893
position or opinion of any other agency,
organisation,

272
00:14:55.213 --> 00:14:59.857
employer or company associated with
StrictlyBusinessPodcast.com.

273
00:15:00.317 --> 00:15:07.283
Assumptions made on the analyses are not
reflective of the position of any other

274
00:15:07.283 --> 00:15:09.283
entity other than the speaker or the
author.

275
00:15:09.283 --> 00:15:13.748
And since we are critically thinking human
beings, these views are always subject to

276
00:15:13.748 --> 00:15:15.748
change, revision, and revision.

277
00:15:15.748 --> 00:15:17.748
and rethinking at any time.

278
00:15:17.748 --> 00:15:18.320
Please do not hold us to them in
perpetuity.
